Mortgage Professional America forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

Privatizing Fannie & Freddie could send mortgage rates soaring -- report

Notify me of new replies via email
Mortgage Professional America | 19 May 2015, 06:58 AM Agree 0
Many frustrated shareholders in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac want the mortgage finance giants released from federal control. But that might not be so great for the mortgage industry, according to a new study
  • | | 19 May 2015, 04:50 PM Agree 0
    I really don't get the Urban Institute's stance here. The say it would be more expensive to release F&F than to keep them in conservatorship. Okay, well what do they propose be done then? Johnson-Crapo isn't going to happen. The PATH act isn't going to happen. Everyone agrees that they shouldn't be in perpetual conservatorship. Release seems to be the only viable option on the table here.

    As for the math in the piece, they start from a flawed premise right from the start. F&F absolutely do not need 10% capital to operate in a safe manner. Even the overzealous stress test that was widely discussed recently demonstrated that under extreme conditions, the companies needed just 5% capital. There's $50 billion in excess reserves on the balance sheet, and based on the payments from the net worth sweep (according to Bloomberg), the senior preferred is down from $117 billion to only $25 billion. Recap would be cheaper, faster, and much more plausible than they make it seem.

    If you look through his other pieces, Parrot seems to have an ideological bias against the GSEs. As Jim Millstein said, he just keeps trying to figure out ways to say "no", instead of solutions to move forward.
  • Confused | | 19 May 2015, 05:07 PM Agree 0
    So the government should buy out the shareholders?
  • Einstein | | 19 May 2015, 05:07 PM Agree 0
    First of all the opposite of privatize is nationalize: were Fannie and Freddie ever nationalized??? Starting from this very title, it is clear that the author either has no clue as to the facts and just simply repeats the BS he has been brainwashed with, or is intentionally distorting the facts to further a personal or quasi-personal agenda (his employer's). How much are you getting paid to write such nonsense? Why should mortgage rates soar if F & F are released, when what held them low is precisely F & F.
Post a reply