Fannie and Freddie proving hard to kill

by Ryan Smith16 Oct 2013

 Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac just won’t stay down no matter how much punishment the government throws at them.

In a rare moment of agreement, both parties in Washington want to dismantle Fannie and Freddie as part of an overhaul of the U.S. housing system. However, that consensus is weakening in the face of stiff opposition from regional banks, hedge funds and other institutions, according to a Bloomberg report.

Adding fuel to the fire are the record profits Fannie and Freddie have been posting – almost all of which go to the Treasury since the companies were bailed out and placed under government conservatorship in 2008. So far, Fannie and Freddie have paid about $146bn to the Treasury, according to Bloomberg.

But both Democrats and Republicans have been eager to scrap the mortgage giants and start over. A Senate bill being drafted by Democrat Tim Johnson of South Dakota and Republican Mark Crapo of Idaho would wind down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in five years, replacing them with a new government insurer and moving more of the risk to private capital. House Republicans, meanwhile, want to dismantle Fannie and Freddie without providing any replacement. A bill that would essentially privatize home finance entirely, the Protecting American Taxpayers and Homeowners (PATH) Act, passed the Financial Services Committee in July without Democratic support.

But some congressional Democrats are unsure Fannie and Freddie should be demolished rather than refurbished. In August, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) broke with President Barack Obama to oppose dismantling the government-sponsored enterprises, and last week Senate Banking Committee Member Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) also expressed doubt.

“I’m not sure that eliminating the GSEs totally makes sense, as some have suggested, and so I have an open mind on it,” Menendez said in an interview.

Private investors, meanwhile, are lobbying hard to preserve Fannie and Freddie. Hedge funds Paulson and Co. and Perry Capital, which own preferred shares in the GSEs, have urged Congress to preserve Fannie and Freddie, arguing that introducing an entirely new system could destabilize the market, Bloomberg reported.
Community banks are also pushing to keep the GSEs intact, fearing a new system would just introduce new regulatory hoops to jump through.

“For a community bank, the process for gaining access to the secondary market would be more difficult than it is today,” Camden Fine, president of the Independent Community Bankers of America, told Bloomberg.


  • by Brian Pickl--Broker Lakes Area Real Estate, LLC | 10/16/2013 9:54:55 AM

    That is a great idea. Dismantle the GSE s just as the Federal Government has "dismantled and Disrupted" private health care as we know it with Obamacare, and watch what a mess it causes. The mortgage meltdown, in my opinion, had little to do with Fannie and Freddie products that are generally conservative in nature; fixed rate traditional mortgages, and also Adjustable Rate Mortgages with predictible indicies and reasonable margins-- and everything to do with Irresponsible BORROWERS and Lenders ; Thats right i did say borrowers; taking agressive 2 year Arm programs. We have gotten used to giving excuses to people who claimed no knowledge of the terms of the Loan Agreements/Notes they were executing and blaming lenders, even though the simple math was presented to them time and time again before executing the closing documents. At what time do we look to the borrower to take responsibilty for and live with the terms under which they agreed to repay their debt?

  • by Thomas Wilson, President, Optima Mortgage | 10/17/2013 9:45:00 AM

    The US housing industry is the back bone of our economy, and is envied by countries all over the world. Dismantling the GSE's would "dry up" mortgage money and significantly increase rates/shorten mortgage terms for anyone wanting to purchase/refinance a home.
    Additionally, the economy would take a significant "hit" if private capital replaced the GSE's with higher rates, shorter mortgage terms, and larger down payments that would significantly lower home ownership and cripple our fragile economy.


Is TILA-RESPA a good or bad thing long term?